Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View
Disciple Of The Beat | |
Arthur BakerArticle from Music Technology, September 1989 |
Dance music should be about more than 'moaning samples and ecstasy' claims producer Arthur Baker. Simon Trask talks to the man behind 'Planet Rock'.
Arthur Baker has long been a respected and versatile remixer and producer. Now, with the release of his own album, he's stepping into the limelight as an artist.
"Four people can use the same sample and one of the records is going to be a hit because of the way that the sample is used."
And what, for Baker, was the most influential aspect of synthpop?
"I think it was the arrangements and the melodies, and the fact that it was synths and not guitar and bass. Vince Clarke is still making great records, basically doing the same thing, which is even more impressive because his songs still sound fresh. He doesn't have to go into trends, he just has this sound that was so ahead of its time it still works now."
DESPITE HIS MANY SUCCESSES IN THE early '80s, Baker's career took a nosedive later in the decade as he struggled with a cocaine addiction. Today, he makes no secret of that period in his life; in fact, he is painfully honest about it.
"In Boston, a friend of mine from high school had an incredible connection, so we were dealing drugs out of the club. Then when I moved to New York I quit cold, and for two years I didn't do anything. Then I was editing a song on the Freez album, and I had to have it done but I was really tired. The engineer said 'Here, try some coke', so I tried it and I felt good. From then on, through the music for the movie Bear Street and the Sun City album, from '85-86, I did tons of coke. Well, it wasn't as much as a lot of people do, but it was enough; all I needed was one line to get fucked up and want to retreat into the woodwork.
"I really lost a lot of ground in my career. In fact, I didn't make another record for about a year. Then at the end of '86 I was working with New Order and I decided I would quit drugs, and that was it. I just said 'Fuck it, I can't do this any more'."
Although he could blame pressures of work as his reason for succumbing to the lure of drugs, Baker is honest enough to admit that "it was just weakness on my part, a way to escape from reality". Nowadays he is emphatic in his condemnation both of drugs and of the people who deal in them.
"I think they're a waste of money, and people who deal drugs are total sleaze assholes who just make money off of people's misery. That alone should be enough to make anyone steer clear of drugs, because the people who live off of other people's blood, who make money off of drugs, are just pathetic fucking scumbags. Regardless of how bad it is for you, just the fact that these scum are making money off of people's misery should be enough."
Once Baker had come off drugs he set about writing songs, and, by his own admission, "started to make really good dance records again". His remixes of Living in a Box, Fine Young Cannibals and Fleetwood Mac were influential in that they were the first house remixes of non-house tracks. His more recent remix credits have included artists as diverse as the Tom Tom Club, the Gypsy Kings, Paul Rutherford, Roberta Flack and Debbie Harry.
These days, however, Baker has his sights set firmly on writing and producing his own material, following in the footsteps of the great producer/writers whose music so inspired him in the '70s.
"I have three different ways of writing a song", he elaborates. "The first way is I come up with a groove, maybe a bassline, and I put that down and then either try to come up with a vocal idea for it or give it to someone else to work on. Then sometimes I'll come up with a melody line but no chorus. The way I usually work, though, is with a chorus, a strong hook, and from there I'll go into the studio with someone who's a keyboard player and programmer, so they can operate all the stuff. I write with three different people who each have a different computer and different sequencing software, so I don't really get into using sequencers. I just play in the parts. I'm not a great keyboard player, but I can play enough to play on the record and get my ideas into the sequencer, which is what's important to me. We use sequencing for getting the song structure together, then we put that on tape and work on the melody and the lyrics. I can always come up with a good hook, but finishing the lyrics is the most difficult part of writing a song for me."
Baker's own 48-track SSL studio, Shakedown, situated in New York, has been running commercially for the past five years.
"I love the flexibility that the SSL desk gives you", he says of the centrepiece of his studio. "Sometimes you can rely on it too much, and you lose spontaneity, but I've been using it since they came out, so I feel that I can work with it in a spontaneous way."
Baker's favoured instrument setup is relatively modest, however:
"I have an Akai S900, which I use mostly for drum sounds and a lot of my bass sounds; I have tons of drum samples. Also I use a Yamaha DX7 and DX7II, a MIDImoog, and a Roland D50 and Juno 60 - always the Juno. I haven't got into digital recording yet, simply 'cos I can't afford it at the moment. Also, most of my clients don't want it, and. the ones who do rent it in. When you own a studio you have to think of your overheads. I know a lot of studios that have gone out of business just because they over-extended themselves."
Baker has seen a steady "democratisation" of both technology and techniques over the years since he first began using synths, samplers and drum machines. Nowhere is this more the case than with sampling. A technique that was once limited to professional studios and musicians has now become the preserve of anyone who fancies themselves as a musician. The repercussions for music have been profound.
"Sampling came into dance music when the Emulator 1 came out, which was '81/82. John Robie had one and Unique Recording Studio had one. The first record I used it on was Freez's 'IOU', with sampled vocals. Also I used it on records like The Awesome Foursome's 'Funky Breakdown', which was the first record that really sampled speeches from other records, like there was Smokey Robinson saying 'Come on, is everybody ready?' from 'Going to the Go Go', and for 'Renegades of Funk' we sampled Martin Luther King saying 'I have a dream'; that was seven years ago.
"Today everything sounds so much better, and the technology's so much cheaper that everyone can afford that stuff. It's incredible. Everyone can have a sampler, everyone can have the same technology. It means nothing."
"Clubgoers don't care about the integrity of artists - people who go to clubs just want to dance, but I think there's more to music than that."
So what does one of the original users of sampling think of the contemporary state of the sampling art, now that everyone can, theoretically at least, own a sampler?
"I'm bored with sampling, to be honest. I think nowadays it's often a gimmick for songs that need gimmicks, although I like the way that Teddy Riley uses samples in his songs. The three dance/street songs on my album are the only ones I use samples on, because that music suits samples, but I'm not going to throw in a sample just for the sake of it; a sample's got to make sense within the record."
Is sampling played out, in Baker's view?
"No, it's really about how you do it. Four people can use the same sample and one of the records is going to be a hit because of the way that the sample's used."
NO TECHNOLOGY INTERVIEW WITH Arthur Baker would be complete without a discussion of remixing. As one of the most experienced and respected practitioners of the art, he must have plenty to say on the subject. As it turns out, not only does he have plenty to say about remixing, he also has plenty to say about the current state of dance music - most of it uncomplimentary. But to start with, what about the ethical considerations of remixing?
"Ninety percent of the remixes I do don't involve the artist. I don't have any ethical problems with that. The record company hires me to do a remix, and the record company should talk to the artist. Artists should have a clause in their contract which says they have to OK remixes. I know I do. If the record company likes a remix and I don't, it doesn't come out. Also, we have to agree on who can remix my records. It was something I was aware of, so I felt it was something I might as well try for in the contract."
In Baker's experience, the usual financial arrangement is a fee against royalties; payment of royalties alone is a rare situation, though he says that if it's for a friend and they're short of money, he'll do the remix for free and just pick up a royalty.
Baker doesn't always have a completely free hand in his remixes. Often there are guidelines to follow:
"They'll specifically say that they want a house mix or a Latin hip hop mix, and sometimes the producer or artist will say 'You can use anything on the tape except for this or that'."
Sometimes, though, you just can't please everyone. Baker recalls that when he was asked to remix the Gypsy Kings' 'Bamboleo' the record company told him not to make it too different, then when the group's producer heard the Latin and Club mixes that Baker did he said they were too conservative.
So how does Baker approach a remix?
"Sometimes I just keep the vocal, it really depends on the track. Most tracks I won't go that far, because if I have to replace the whole thing then there's something wrong. There has to be something there that I like, or I wouldn't have taken the job. In most cases I replace the drums and the bassline, and then add other keyboards, but usually keep some of the original keyboard parts.
"I would never do anything that's against the integrity of the artist. I draw the line there, and I think that's why artists with integrity come to me because they know I'm not going to go for the cheap thrill. I have a pretty good background in music, and I can't think of one artist I've remixed whose music I didn't already know. Other remixers probably don't have that approach, but they should.
"With Springsteen's stuff I tried to add parts that he could have had on the record before but just didn't do. That's one of the major points he's made when he's talked about my remixes - that they sound like something he might have done. I wouldn't put Bruce's voice in the Emulator and play around with it. You don't want it to be out of character with the artist; that's really important. Even when I did the Fleetwood Mac house remix it wasn't totally out of character.
"You have to have an understanding of the artist, but some remixers simply don't care about that. They don't have a historical perspective on the artist, they just go ahead and do whatever they want. Which isn't to say that that approach doesn't work. For instance, Steve Hurley and I both did remixes of Roberta Flack's 'Uh uh oh oh'. Even though I changed the song drastically, I kept the basic keyboard and melody and changed the bassline and the drums a little bit. But he totally recut the track, and it just sounds like a Steve Hurley record with Roberta Flack sampled on top; that isn't what I would have thought the record company wanted, but the fact is, that version is the one I hear a lot in clubs."
And what does Baker put this fact down to? His old impatience with club audiences comes to the surface as he explains his viewpoint.
"Clubgoers have no historical sense, and they don't care about the integrity of artists. People who go to clubs just want to dance, but I think there's more to music than that. Music is for dancing, but also when you write a song you're trying to communicate ideas, not just moaning, samples and ecstasy. I think with remixes and with dance music in general today, the only idea that's communicated is 'let's get fucked up and dance'. I was in a club last night and I didn't hear one damned vocal version of anything; it was all dub mixes. When I do a dub mix I still try to keep the essence of the song, and highlight vocal lines that I feel are important. That's why I do dropouts a lot in my mixes. I'll drop out all the music so that you just hear this one voice, 'cos that puts attention onto the lyric. With the guys now you can forget that; they make people dance but they don't make them think. People are in such a hurry to have a good time that they don't even want to hear the words.
"I think people who make dance records nowadays totally pander to the dancefloor. No-one's really doing anything innovative, it's all stale, all the same samples, all the same grooves, hip house music all sounds alike. The rappers are all boring and tired, but people still buy those records."
Harsh words indeed, but there's a lot of truth in what Baker has to say. As dance music crosses over to commercial success and the majors take an ever-increasing piece of the action, so it seems that a new agenda and new priorities are being set for dance music. But surely the music that Baker himself is making is commercially inspired.
What I'm doing is writing songs that I hear in my head, and I hear some commercial songs. But if I was really trying to be commercial I wouldn't have made this record, I would have made a straight dance record, because that's what people know me for and that's what people expect. Instead I did what I wanted to do for myself, because I want to make a record that I can listen to at home, and I can't listen to that sample shit for any more than ten minutes without getting sick of it."
As for the future, Baker is clear where his priorities lie.
"I want to have a No. 1 record, I want to write great songs, and I want to have my songs covered by great singers. I'm going to keep writing songs till I drop. But with producing, who knows? There are lots of guys who have been producing for 20 or 30 years, so as long as there's something that excites me I'll keep on producing. But I'll definitely keep on writing, that much I know."
Interview by Simon Trask
Previous article in this issue:
Next article in this issue:
mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.
If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!
New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.
All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.
Do you have any of these magazine issues?
If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!