Magazine Archive

Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View

Music In Our Schools

Choosing The Technology

Stephanie Sobey-Jones tackles the tricky subject of selecting appropriate hardware when setting up a school music lab.

Stephanie Sobey-Jones underlines the importance of choosing the right equipment as the basis of a music teaching system.

Is the use of technology in music teaching an expensive gimmick, or does it perform a genuinely valuable function? In the depths of school Music departments all over the country, there is even more frantic activity than usual — meetings, courses, schemes of work — will it all fall into place ready for September? I am, of course, referring to the implementation of National Curriculum Music, and once more that 't' word is rearing its controversial head. While it is generally agreed that the incorporation of technology into Music and other subjects is an excellent idea, the actual role of the technology in the Music class still seems to be something of a grey area. This would appear to be due, in part at least, to the fact that the National Curriculum guidelines seem to contain fewer specific references to types of equipment, and suggestions for its use than perhaps were originally anticipated by many teachers. Do I detect sighs of relief all round? Perhaps not! Ironically, the new guidelines (and it must be stressed that the examples given in the document for use of various instruments/equipment are ideas rather than compulsory activities) would seem to have inadvertently opened up one or two new cans of worms. "How do I justify buying all this expensive equipment in the light of the new guidelines?" I have been asked on more than one occasion. "What good is one computer and a Portastudio to a class of 25?"

Stephanie Sobey-Jones is a schools music and technology consultant and home studio owner.

Obviously the question of funding is one with which we are all familiar. In most schools, a well-equipped room which can provide technology and recording facilities for a class of 25 is still something of a dream rather than a reality. So, is the concept of music technology in school still to be considered as a luxury 'gimmick' to be enjoyed by only a few pupils? And does its seemingly disproportionate representation possibly imply that musical skill is still likely to be measured in terms of the ability to master what we could term the more 'conventional' performance activities?

There are those who would argue that playing the violin demands a greater level of technical and musical expertise than the 'button pushing' which is associated with technology-based activities. Speaking as a classically-trained cellist turned music technology lecturer and studio owner, I cannot deny that the 'button pushing' and the violin playing demand somewhat different types of skill, but is it fair to imply that the end product of one activity is more or less musically valid than the other? Both activities demand a high degree of co-ordination and aural perception, and we must not forget that at the end of the day, enjoyment of our favourite recording, live broadcast, or concert performance is due as much to the technical and aural skills of the engineer and producer as it is to those of the performer.

Music For All

Button pushing or not, the advent of technology in the Music class opens up the possibilities of music making for everyone, and interestingly enough, there are many more people involved in the recording, production and manipulation of music and sound than there are earning their living as performers. Education supposedly provides training for life, therefore if our pupils emerge with an interest in music and a desire to be involved with its production in any way and on any level, does it really matter how that interest has been stimulated? I believe that if the use of technology in the Music class opens up that subject to everyone, then those new resources are well justified. I have not yet encountered a student who could not use a keyboard and a small multitracker to achieve something tangible, whereas I have met more than a few who have experienced difficulty mastering even the basic rudiments of an instrument. It perhaps begs the question: which resource is actually the luxury 'gimmick'?

The Right Choice

The justification of the resources is, however, only the tip of the iceberg. Is it not perhaps the use and integration of those resources which is more likely to cause the grief? Several teachers have commented to me that, on the surface, those National Curriculum programmes of study would seem to provide little scope for the integration of technology within some of the various tasks. Here, I tend to disagree. I think there is a good deal of scope, but it requires an understanding of what your equipment will do and how it can be combined and integrated with other more conventional resources.

There is still a tendency to treat the larger, more expensive items, such as computers, multitrackers and multi-effects units, as an end in themselves, designed to do more isolated and specialised tasks — for example, printing band parts and recording GCSE compositions. Although these tasks often more than justify the purchase of the equipment in the first place, it should not be forgotten that these pieces of equipment are in themselves tools of composition and sound manipulation in much the same way that more conventional resources are. This is certainly how they are regarded by the people who use them every day in the music industry.

Equipment Familiarity

Perhaps one of the problems with the use of technology in the classroom is the way in which we are taught to handle it in the first place as students. In actual fact, those of us who qualified as teachers more than ten years ago (in the pre-MIDI era!) were very lucky even to have sight of an electronic keyboard of any description. Nowadays, more recently qualified teachers will most likely have had an opportunity to work with a variety of technology resources at some point during their training. But does the exposure to technology necessarily give us the expertise needed to handle those resources in a busy classroom situation?

The average music teacher rarely has a technician on hand to sort out those little running problems which tend to occur when there are enthusiastic and enquiring little minds about (and I am not talking about the ability to perform actual repairs and other feats of technical wizardry). I can honestly say that when working with students of all ages, a greater proportion of time is often spent sorting out what has gone wrong with a recording or a sequence, rather than getting down to the straightforward business of creating the material in the first place! This really boils down to gaining a gradual understanding of how things work, and you do not need to become an expert in order to master enough basic concepts to successfully integrate technology into the music lesson.

Setting The Pace

It is generally best to introduce new equipment gradually and then use it to perform simple tasks. When you feel you have mastered one hurdle, then move onto the next. Don't feel you have to bring out every item in your new classroom technology system in a big blaze of glory right at the beginning of term!

"In most schools, a well-equipped room which can provide technology and recording facilities for a class of 25 is still something of a dream rather than a reality."

In the first place, however, successful integration stems from having the right kind of equipment — fundamental problems often arise when equipment is purchased which may not be entirely suitable for the job it is required to do. Worse still, certain pieces of equipment may be quite incompatible with others. Setting up a music technology system in a classroom is one of the most difficult tasks a music teacher may be required to do and, ironically, practice in using and understanding the equipment often cannot take place until the equipment itself has been purchased — a potential 'Catch 22' situation. And in any event, equipping a department from scratch is a luxury afforded to few of us.


As is more often the case, we are trying to extend our resources, taking into account the potential compatibility or non-compatibility of what is already there, and that is where the conflicts start to occur. Imagine the case of the newly-appointed Head of Music who, keen to get into the exciting world of using a computer program to ', alter and replay a composition' (National Curriculum Key Stage 3), finds that among the two dozen or so fairly elderly keyboards he or she is about to inherit in the new department, there is not a single MIDI socket in sight! "Why do you need another keyboard as well as this expensive computer, I thought you already had at least two dozen?" asks the holder of the purse strings (who is probably not a musician). "Surely there must be some sort of gadget you can buy which will fit on the back of one of your keyboards to make it work with the computer. Can't you have the keyboard altered in some way? Anyway, why do you want this sort of computer in the first place, it's different from any of the others we have in the school, go and see if the Computer Studies department will lend you one of theirs for the odd lesson." This hypothetical case quite often has its parallels in real school situations. Why spend more money when there are resources which surely will do? They may 'do', but will they become the root of other problems when you start to expand your facilities?

Next month, I'll put together a typical system from scratch, which might be suitable for use by pupils in the 11-18 age range, including both GCSE and 'A' Level classes. The features of the various pieces of equipment will be discussed, and I'll consider how each piece can integrate with other resources. The system will primarily be based around types of equipment which are highlighted in the National Curriculum Guidelines, but will also include some interesting additional items to help give every pupil maximum accessibility to the equipment, and enjoyment from the lesson.

Do The Right Thing

There are a number of points which will be particularly relevant when we actually start to consider what specific types of equipment to include in a typical classroom technology setup:

1. How do various types of equipment actually behave? Do they perform a single function, or can they be used for a number of activities? For example, one of the most common uses of a computer is to run a sequencing package of some sort, but there is also a variety of software which can perform different tasks, such as ear training; here is a case where a piece of equipment does not necessarily have to be limited to use by only two or three pupils at once.

2. Each type of equipment is generally available from at least two or three different manufacturers and in a number of models. Each make and model will have slightly different features, some of which will be more vital to your personal classroom needs than others. But be warned — a feature which may not seem particularly useful at the moment might become essential later on as your system expands, so you need to consider how a piece of equipment will link up with other equipment, and whether it can have an upgrade or expansion at a later date.

An additional point to consider here might be the suitability of a piece of equipment to your particular 'user age range' — a problem rather peculiar to education. In a school with an 11-18 age range for example, can equipment selected for class use by 11-14 year olds also be adequate working tools for the sixth-form music student?

3. Can a new piece of equipment be integrated with your existing resources? For instance, if you want a computer, you will also require a MIDI keyboard (and some leads!) Have a look at your existing equipment first to see how potential new items can be incorporated, otherwise this can be an expensive mistake. Also consider whether you will be fortunate enough to have exclusive use of your equipment. In a number of smaller schools (and particularly in the case of primary schools), resources often have to be shared, and will be required to perform slightly different tasks. The best solution here is for everyone concerned to list the features and facilities which are essential/desirable, then at least some good compromise can be effected. It might not be an ideal situation, but at least it should mean that everyone can make use of something!

4. Finally, a word of warning. If you are fortunate enough to be given some funding for new equipment (make the most of it — it doesn't happen too often), it is worth considering the vital aspects of security and safety. After all, the last thing you need is unwelcome visitors during the night. Many schools now have some form of security system, and if this is the case, see if you can persuade the powers that be to add an extra sensor to the music room. Failing that, if you have access to a lockable stock room, this could be another alternative. If your music room is newly designed, it may have been fitted with a Residual Current Device (RCD), thus preventing damage to your pupils and your equipment in the case of an electrical fault! If this is not the case, consider budgeting for a few portable RCD's which are easily obtainable from any supermarket electrical department, and which should definitely be used where pupils are bringing their own pieces of equipment, such as electric guitars or microphones into the class. This way you can begin your technology activities with peace of mind in at least one area!

Previous Article in this issue

Win Your Dream Studio!

Recording Musician - Copyright: SOS Publications Ltd.
The contents of this magazine are re-published here with the kind permission of SOS Publications Ltd.


Recording Musician - Sep 1992

Donated & scanned by: Mike Gorman



Previous article in this issue:

> Win Your Dream Studio!

Next article in this issue:

> Kenton Electronics Pro2 MIDI...

Help Support The Things You Love

mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.

If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!

Donations for December 2019
Issues donated this month: 1

Issues that have been donated this month.

Funds donated this month: £12.00

All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.

If you're enjoying the site, please consider supporting me to help build this archive...

...with a one time Donation, or a recurring Donation of just £2 a month. It really helps - thank you!

Small Print

Terms of usePrivacy