The Dynamic Duo
Yamaha smash new price barriers with their latest FM synths - the DX100 and DX27. Mark Jenkins assesses their performance as stand-alone keyboards and as compact MIDI expanders.
Yamaha have smashed new price barriers with their latest FM synthesizers. Mark Jenkins assesses their performance as stand-alone keyboards and as compact MIDI expanders...
Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the waters of budget synthesis, Yamaha have turned the market on its head (again!) with two new synths derived from their recently-launched DX21.
In fact, some recent DX21 purchasers may well be annoyed by the launch of the new models, albeit with very little justification - the DX21 is a little more powerful than either, but at £699 it's clearly in a slightly higher price bracket too.
However, the DX21 is a good starting point for understanding the two new models, which have practically identical specifications other than in the details of packaging. The DX27 has five octaves of standard keys and the DX100 has four octaves of miniature keys, plus performance controls positioned for 'round-the-neck' playing. It's an obvious rival to the successful Casio CZ-101, and since it sells for around the same price it will give many purchasers a difficult decision between the prestige of FM and the flexibility of Casio's Phase Distortion sounds.
The DX100 and DX27 voicings are to all intents and purposes identical. While the DX21 had eight voices splittable at any point on the keyboard, the 27 and 100 each have eight voices with no split option. While the DX-21 had 128 preset sounds, the DX27 and 100 each have 192. While the DX21 had 32 RAM memories, the DX27 and 100 each have only 24...
And so it goes on. It's easier to list the differences between the DX27 and DX100 than it is to list the many similarities. The smaller DX100 has a sprung up/down pitch bender and a modulation wheel on the rear edge, while the larger DX27 has wheels on the front panel a la Moog Rogue. The 100 can be battery powered or can use an optional mains transformer, whereas the 27 works only from the mains transformer supplied. And the 27 has a music stand while the DX100 does not. That's about it as far as the differences are concerned, so from this point on we'll refer to the DX100 which, as we'll see, may work out the better bargain.
The DX100 voice, like that of the discontinued DX9, is based on four FM operators. Anyone who has been living in a cave for the past few years may find the following pocket definition of FM synthesis handy: Analogue (subtractive) synthesis takes complex waveforms and cuts them down using selective filtering. Frequency Modulation (FM, digital, or additive) synthesis takes simple sine waves and stacks them up to create something much more complex than analogue synthesis could create in a month of Sundays. Now the industry standard Yamaha DX7 has six operators (FM sine wave generators) in each voice, but that doesn't mean that the DX100, limited to four operators, doesn't get a look in. Even a single pair of operators (one operator by itself gives only a boring sine wave) can create very complex sounds, so four operators give plenty of possibilities. The DX100 will give you brass sounds, piano sounds, breaking glass sounds, wind, bells, windbells, lots of things, all with a power and realism belying its compact size.
The basic form of each sound is decided, as usual, by the algorithm used. This is the order in which the operators modulate each other's frequency, and decide whether the sound has one main audio component and three kinds of modulation, two of each, or three audio components and only one kind of modulation (of course, there are envelopes and other functions to be taken into account as well). The DX100 has eight alternative algorithms.
The machine also has an impressive stack of factory programmed sounds-192 in all. These are accessed through a mode known as Bank Play, and the sounds are arranged in four banks of 24 (Shift Mode gets at the second group of 96 presets). The preset sounds are as follows:
|Group 1||Group 2||Group 3||Group 4|
|E-pianos||Brass||Lead I||Effects I|
|Plucked||Keybds||Perc I||Effects II|
That's about it for the programmable performance parameters. The DX100 also features all the bread-and-butter functions for dumping and recalling sounds and for controlling its MIDI functions, the latter of which deserve a closer look.
The DX100 is very much a product of the MIDI generation, and as we've implied, could well find its major application as a MIDI expander. It's infinitely easier to use than a TX7 (which is only truly compatible with a DX7 anyway), it has its own keyboard without being too bulky, and it's VELOCITY AND PRESSURE SENSITIVE OVER MIDI. Bet that woke you up. The ability to create velocity effects from a DX7 or other velocity-sensitive synth or mother keyboard, or from a velocity-programmed sequencer such as the QX1, QX7 or Roland MSQ-700, takes the DX100 into a whole new world of sound.
Quite apart from velocity and pressure response, the DX100 can deal with Sustain, Mono/Poly, Pitch Bend, Modulation, Breath Control, Data Entry, Volume, Portamento and Patch Change information over MIDI, or completely sever itself from any outside MIDI influence using the MIDI On/Off function. It can dump sounds via MIDI to another DX100 or DX27, or deal with 24 of the sounds from a DX21, the remaining six having to be loaded one at a time using the cunningly named Load Single function.
The almost-60 page handbook for the DX100 is, to say the least, comprehensive. If you want to rewrite the machine's operating ROM, here's the book to help you do it (we exaggerate slightly). But a few interesting facts do turn up - such as the ten-hour battery life, which seems reasonable, the MIDI Active Sensing (which means that notes won't drone on if the MIDI In lead is accidentally pulled out), and the table of frequency ratios for the operators. While the DX7 allowed you to use any ratio at all, the newer designs offer a large selection of the more obvious ratios (64 of them for each operator) which will help you create sounds more quickly. Probably only the computer musicians at IRCAM Paris will feel a sense of loss.
Both the DX100 and the DX27 have headphone sockets and MIDI Thru sockets, and on power up flash a hearty "Welcome to DX!" message on the LCD display. Heartless cynics amongst you will be glad to know that this message can be changed to anything you like.
Now comes the time to make some recommendations about the DX100 and DX27, which will of course be slightly modified by your personal needs. There are very few negative points to be made - of course, it's awkward learning the difference between Bank, Internal and Preset memories, how to copy operator envelopes or change the frequency ratio of the third carrier along. But that's all part of FM, and the new DXs certainly deliver the goods in performance once they're programmed up to your individual needs.
But the DX27 fails to move me. It's perfectly adequate as a budget keyboard, perhaps for the beginner intending to move up or for the analogue synth devotee who wants to add FM sounds relatively cheaply. But the machine just seems like a DX21 without the key split and with even fewer programmable memories - it's £200 cheaper (£499), but if it's cheapness we're looking for, at £349 the DX100 is definitely the one to go for.
As a MIDI expander, the DX100 is incredible. Lots of scratch preset sounds, enough memories to store your favourite patches, enormously compact but with a keyboard large enough to play if your mother keyboard isn't to hand. Amazing MIDI response, battery power for portability with performance controls for on-stage posing if that's your thing. It's a bit too big to go into a 19-inch rack, but should find a place in every home studio - and in a lot of professional outfits too.
Gear in this article:
Feature by Mark Jenkins
Previous article in this issue:
Next article in this issue: