Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View
Discotek | |
The Microphone Input stageArticle from Electronics & Music Maker, February 1983 | |


When the shortcomings of high impedance microphones are unacceptable, electret and certain capacitor microphones (notably the Calrec 600 series types) can make use of the same simple input circuitry without significant degradation of their excellent characteristics, and indeed, alternative component values suited to the Calrec microphones are depicted in brackets. Note here the revised input circuit wiring, wherein a non-standard 4-pin socket (e.g. 4-pin XLR) ensures that mics other than Calrec's don't accidentally receive the polarising voltage (45V), so avoiding potential damage. Aside from capacitor microphones, a substantially flat response and well-behaved directional properties usually spell a low impedance dynamic mic, and without the problems of long cables and the necessity to design for the ultimate in low-noise performance, we can again 'get by' with a relatively simple input stage (Figure 2). In this circuit, a transformer provides much of the voltage gain, but more important, it allows both the microphone and op-amp to 'see' load and source impedances respective to their needs, these being commensurate with low noise and good treble response. It is possible to achieve good results from a transformerless input stage, but the expense of a transformer is exchanged for an equally expensive op-amp having paralleled input devices, not to mention the extra circuit complexity. Returning to Figure 2, low impedance mics have, as a rule, balanced terminations, but the beauty of the transformer input is the ease with which unbalanced mics can be accommodated, simply by shorting half the transformer winding. Sometimes it may be necessary to use long microphone cables, and if this is likely, R1, R2 and C1 can be added to maintain stability under such conditions; their values should be determined empirically with varying cable lengths. Finally, the specified low-noise op-amp can be substituted by members of the cheaper BI-FET species (viz: TL071/LF351N) if a marginal degree of extra hiss can be tolerated. The answer to this question depends largely upon the noise generated by your audience versus the SPL, and hence the degree of amplification of your vocals.

Having purchased an expensive microphone, you should find that the gain you can achieve just prior to feedback will provide ample vocals intensity at a speaking distance of 3" to 6"; with greater proximity, the sound quality will be severely muddied unless the mic has 'vocals compensation' (bass rolloff) and an effective pop shield (see 'Sound on Stage', E&MM December 81). Susceptibility to howlround in a discotheque sound system frequently calls for fastidious mic positioning, largely as a result of the proximity of the speakers. Here, a boom stand (e.g. P+N 139) is an invaluable aid to finding — and maintaining — a trouble free mic position, as well as keeping both hands free whilst making an announcement.
Another advantage of boom-mounted mics is the ease with which the directional properties of your voice may be exploited, notably different vocal sounds are available by positioning the mic either above or below the lips.
Perhaps the most irritating aspect of using a microphone stand is the ease with which run-of-the-mill plastic mic clips are destroyed — usually with the aid of clumsy footwork. These are not cheap to replace, and yet a solid-metal spring clamp with rubber pads to provide a secure grip (e.g. Keith Monks 'MC1') will cost only twice the sum and probably last ten years. To end, bear in mind that whilst high-quality dynamic and capacitor microphones are rugged creatures, their unscheduled failure can have unpleasant repercussions; if your mic doesn't have a foam-lined carrying case, an old padded bag is an excellent, if shortlived, means of providing protection in transit.
| Normal conversational talking | 106dBA |
| Exuberant talking | 125dBA |
| Very loud laugh or shout | 130dBA |
These measurements taken with the lips 1" from the microphone mesh.
Typical microphone output voltages
| Microphone Model | Type | Sensitivity | Nominal Output Voltage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (per uBar) | @110dBA | @125dBA | ||
| Shure 515SA | High Imp. moving coil | 1.1mV | 66mV | 390mV |
| Calrec 654 | Capacitor, unbalanced | 1.5mV | 90mV | 532mV |
| Calrec 1051 | Capacitor, Phantom powered | 0.8mV | 48mV | 284mV |
| ElectroVoice | PL80 Low Imp. Moving coil | 250uV | 15mV | 89mV |
Lab Notes: The Polyphonic Synthesizer |
Starting Point (Part 1) |
Dual Voltage-Controlled LFO |
Where to Stick It - Miking Tips |
4780 Sequencer Modification |
Magic Buttons - Touch Switch Theory |
Mikes And The Mechanics |
How To Make An EGG Mod |
Sound Bites - Production Tips & Techniques |
Electro-Music Engineer - Tuning Up — A Review of VCO Calibration Methods (Part 1) |
Modify Your "Phlanger" - for Lower Noise |
Browse by Topic:
Feature by Ben Duncan
mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.
If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!
New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.
All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.
Do you have any of these magazine issues?
If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!