Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View
Tokai 3-Bender & 55H Guitars | |
Article from One Two Testing, February 1986 | |
A coloured Tele and a Strattish thing

AND A PSYCHEDELIC YEEHAW to you all. Country and Western Acid-Rock is well up for next big thing. Or so Tokai obviously hope, judging by the fact that they've installed their C&W strap-button stringbender in a Paisley Tele copy. Not even the most tasteless Rhinestone-covered stack-heeled Nashville cat would dare to don a fluorescent pink Paisley geetar. I'm sure. And despite the present hordes of Yankee twangmerchants, I'm also sure that piling in loads of imitation pedal steel licks to your best fuzzed solo would result in the rest of your band turning on the heels of their white Chelsea boots and storming out of the rehearsal garage.
But never mind the finish (conversation piece or coronary arrest inducer though it may be), what's the idea of this here three-bender device?
Basically it's a sort of complicated wang bar, worked by a system of pulleys, springs and wires running from the top strap button to the bridge. You pull up on the button, by the action of shrugging your left shoulder or conversely pushing down on the neck of the guitar, and a lever behind the bridge moves backwards, pulling the top three strings a semitone up. When you stop pulling up on the strap button, springs bring it back into tune again. Simple as that.
It was first devised and built into a guitar years ago by a couple of geezers called Parsons and White, pukka Country types. They actually didn't go quite as far as bending the top three strings - theirs was merely a 'B' bender. But the principle was the same.
Albert Lee: "When I first got the B bender I used it everywhere, all over the place, but you learn not to do that alter a while. It makes your shoulder ache after a lot of playing, though."
The practice, in practice, is a little different. The three top strings bend up with a good hard shrug, but it has to be a serious effort. Not for the weak of shoulder, by any means.
And if you've got one of those slippery nylon straps it'll skid across your brawny Rambo-esque physique to such a ridiculous extent that you have to pull four times as hard and run the risk of rupturing yourself explosively on stage. It may be a fine stage gimmick for your band 'The Flaming Puke Brothers' when all your backbone emerges with a loud ripping noise from the top of your head but it'll leave you a little too liquid to make the most of your subsequent success.
The tuning, too, leaves a little to be desired after you've used the device more than a couple of times. There's none of this flash rubbish like locking nuts, and the slots where the strings pass through the back of the bridge have been hacksawed out somewhat inaccurately, so it should be no surprise that the strings stick here, there and everywhere leaving you high and dry.

Alan Holdsworth: "The thing that lets Fender down is their pickups. Gibson ones ore much better. And I prefer a wider, flatter neck as well..."
If this is really what you need, and you feel your Country cred depends on it, why not? On the other hand, at approaching half a grand maybe you could do worse than practice left hand finger exercises or take a serious look at some wang bars.
Next, the 55H - a guitar that'll please those connoisseurs of the six-string who hanker for odd hybrids of the Gibson and Fender genres.
It's not a million miles - in fact not more than a couple of millimetres - from the beloved Whatsitocaster design. You know the one; Jimi Hendrix, Hank Marvin, trebly back pickup, wang bar, three pickups, Mark Knopfler, blah blah blah. Right.
The crucial differences that make this more than just a very good replica are threefold.
One is the rear pickup - a humbucker. Not a bad humbucker, as they go, with a pleasantly throaty but not overdistorted raunch giving way to a smooth, warbly Jazz'n'Blues sound when you take it down a little.
Unfortunately, it's just a humbucker, and that's all you get. No phase reverse, no coil split, no tapped windings, just the basic unadulterated noise. Which is pleasant enough, but it would be much nicer to at least have the option of the clear, toppy classic back pickup sound if you wanted it. Ah well.
The second thing is the fingerboard, which is the reason most people would buy it. Look at the guitar and it's a Strat copy. Pick it up and play it, mind you, and it's a Gibson. Whoopee! cry all those people who really like Les Pauls but can't stand the unchanging roar of two great stonking humbuckers or the loss of street cred involved in being seen wearing a guitar associated with Thin Lizzy, Led Zeppelin and hundreds of boring American AOR bands.

Review by Chris Maillard
Previous article in this issue:
Next article in this issue:
mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.
If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!
New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.
All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.
Do you have any of these magazine issues?
If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!