Magazine Archive

Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View

Toys R Us

Utah Saints

The techno punk duo on U2, sampling theft, virtual reality, CDI, and getting the machines to rock.


Utah Saints Jez Willis and Tim Garbutt had three hit singles with Annie Lennox, Kate Bush and Phil Oakey guesting on vocals. Only they didn't - the real singer was called Akai. They have already proved that the 'live' singer is redundant. Now they're on the road with a multimedia show that reflects the sensory assault of TV and Nintendo chaos. And whilst their debut album Utah Saints has been extending their reputation into established CD territory, future product promises to be equally multisensory. Whether it's computer graphics, laser disc or virtual reality, the Utahs will be there when the next generation of recorded product arrives.

On this whole live thing.



Jez: "The image I had of the portable-keyboard performer was the dodgy jazz band with an SH101, right up here on top of a mound of keyboards. So I use the hand-held Yamaha KX5, and the beauty of it is that you can chuck it around a bit. And you can lay out the keygroups to have three or four keys doing the same thing — so if you miss the 'right' key, you're covered. In most things we do, there's an anarchic punk streak, and if you lose that it makes it too sterile. We're trying to make machines rock."

Tim: 'We played a big rave in Miami with 808 State, Rage Against The Machine and Meat Beat Manifesto, with techno DJs inbetween, and it was really cool. The variety of music was the important thing — in America, 'rave' covers a much wider spectrum. Over here, you either get garage, or techno, or breakbeat, or whatever, but everything should be mingled."

Jez: "That night in Miami was really dynamic, and I think by necessity things are going to have to get more dynamic over here, with bands touring together. Our first break out of the rave circuit was doing a festival with Jesus Jones about a year ago. The rave circuit was frustrating because it was geared up for people miming to DAT, and we would have made more money if we'd done that, but we didn't want to stand in front of a few disconnected keyboards for half an hour and pretend to be Utah Saints..."

Tim: "The big worry for us was going from three sample-based hit singles to selling albums, which is really important. Only a few dance-based acts have done it yet — 808 State, Prodigy, Sunscreem — and they're the ones that go out and do the live thing."

Jez: "On stage, we want the freedom to run about, so about 40% of what we do is on DAT — basic kick and sequencing — and everything else is played on top."

On the way forward...



Jez: "There are some bands who almost want to deny they use technology, and go completely acoustic. For us, that defeats the purpose, because the way forward is to use new sounds and new combinations of sounds, and the way to do that is to use samples. Technology is the way forward in everything, and it's the way forward in music. I started out as a keyboard player, but then I found I could get computers to play what I couldn't play, so that seemed like a pretty good way forward..."

On supporting U2...



Tim: "We did some dates with U2 in Europe, and we thought we'd sequence everything on stage, but we only had two weeks to prepare so we remixed about 40% of the parts in each song onto DAT.

"We didn't have much time to soundcheck either. U2 would soundcheck right up to the doors opening, so half the time our first song would be getting the levels right in front of the audience. We didn't have our own monitor engineer, either, so it would take half a song to get a level changed, waving across this huge stage to their monitor man...

"They do some cool stuff: they drop samples and loops from video cassette over the top of what they're playing, like Martin Luthor King making a speech. That's a great move forward, sampling with video so it's all linked in. The next thing we're going to do is look into ways of properly synchronising the video screens that we use on stage with the music."

On future pop media...



Jez; "TV has become such an important part of the culture, we're surrounded by information and disinformation. It has huge benefits, but huge disadvantages too, as a medium, and we want to show images from TV in a new context to highlight this. For us, it has to be something that doesn't detract from what we're doing on stage, but which provides an added visual stimulus. We're still experimenting, at this stage.

What's happening is that video games are taking over from music, but the music on most games is appalling. As poeple start buying multimedia formats, we have to make sure that the music is not an afterthought, so you can buy a CD with really good music on it, plus some kind of visual element as well — whether it's virtual reality, CDI or whatever. We really want to get involved as it develops. At the moment, virtual reality is commercially fairly basic, and very expensive, but what's going to happen is that the visuals will get more realistic. It's quite scary, but when that happens the music better be good..."

Tim: "At the moment it's just computerised graphics, but when it incorporates real footage it'll get quite scary..."

Jez: "It's a shame, in a way... maybe music should be able to exist on its own. But the sensory assault from visuals and sound is closing the gap between them, and that's the way forward."

On having hit records.



Jez: 'We started out expecting to sell a thousand white labels, but then we got signed. And we ended up in the ridiculous situation of having a Top Ten hit and only one song. So we've been trying to catch up with our own success for the last two years. We tried to step back, but then things started going well in America, so we had to go out there. You never get a chance to catch your breath."


On sampling vocals...



Jez: "On the next single, 'I Want You', I sampled myself and put it through the Digitech Vocalist — which is a brilliant machine. I then resampled that with pitchbend on it, so there's this really weird effect on the chorus. It's down to whatever a track needs. We wanted to do three tracks using a sampled voice as the lead instrument, now we've done that and we'll move onto other things. But we'll always use samples, taking things and putting them into a different context. We'd rather spend £3000 on a new sampler than a 'classic' analogue synth..."

Tim: "We don't collect synths, we collect CDs.

Jez: "What made me realise that samplers could rock was when I was doing some bass in Peter Hook's studio in Manchester, and I thought I'd add some keyboards. So they gave me an old Emulator. And when it went down, and all the lights started flashing, the engineer just said 'give it a good kickin' and it will sort itself out'. I felt you just don't do that to such an expensive piece of gear, so he came in and kicked it so hard he raised it off the ground. And it was fine after that. That was when I knew these things weren't precious, they could have energy and life."

On sampling as theft...



Jez: "We'd never just use the essence of someone else's song and use it as the basis of our own — although that is a valid art form in itself. Sampling gets a bad name because there are some unscrupulous people around who'll take anything and use it as the basis of their song. But if you extrapolate that argument to an absurd degree, every keyboard manufacturer would have to sue everyone that uses their sounds, because they created the sounds. People who slag off sampling then pick up a guitar and play in the same style that someone else has already done."

Tim: "'What Can You Do For Me' came out about the same time as PM Dawn's single that used Spandau Ballet's 'True', but because there was a rap over it people's attention was focussed on that. We created something new with Annie Lennox's voice, but because it was the voice — the focal point — people gave us a much harder time. As soon as there's a 'singer', everyone ignores the backing track."

Jez: "This argument will probably go on for years. When 'S-Express' came out, MT was full of letters saying 'anybody can do this', and the editorial reply was always 'OK, go and do it, then...'. Which was absolutely right — and still is."

On stage:

Jez: Korg 01/W; Stepp guitar synth; bass; Yamaha KX5 triggering rackmounted Akai S1100.

"The Stepp triggers the S1100, too. There's a switch for internal/external sounds. It takes some getting used to; the strings on the neck aren't attached to the strings that you hit. So there's no delay, and it gets the note to play from the left hand, and how you want to play it from the right hand simultaneously. And when you're dealing with MIDI, you're never quite sure what information it's getting. One wrong touch, and you can completely scramble the S1100. It'll send out all sorts of filter and SysEx information, when all you wanted was an A...

"We're going to get a 3000-series Akai so we can improve the loops in the studio. Just about all our records phase a little in the rhythm section, because of the slight delay between left and right."

Tim: 2 x Technics turntables; Made II Fade mixer; Akai S950; Yamaha KX5. Tim also operates the DAT machine. "The only drawback with DAT is that once you've finalised the mix, it's a fixed length and you can't change it according to how well the song's going."

Lee Dyson: Korg 01/W

Keith Langley: Simmons pads triggering Yamaha RM50 rhythm sound module; Samson Concert TD Series noise reduction unit. The pads play bass drum, two snares, two toms and a timbale.

Peligrino Riccardi: acoustic percussion.

Jez: "There's no click, so if there's bad monitoring, and three of us are playing loops with two of us playing along, then we can go into some pretty weird jazz polyrhythms..."

6 x Sony TV monitors (courtesy of Nintendo); the video images are also projected onto a black backcloth.

Tim: "We're both complete Sega and Nintendo freaks, and we're really interested in virtual reality and CDI, so the video images are dominated by computer graphics."


In the studio:

Jez: "We started out with an S950 and a Kawai K1, and that was it - that's what we did 'What Can You Do For Me' on. We had two days studio time for three hundred quid. At the moment, we're still having to write in the studio - Lion Studios, in Leeds - but once we've got a good set of monitors we'll start working at home."

Tim: "We don't use tape, so we won't need a multitrack."

Jez: "We're really impatient: it takes so long to wind back tape... So if we're doing vocals we put them onto DAT, sample one line at a time and trigger them from Cubase. It takes a little longer at the recording stage, but saves a hell of lot of time at the mixing stage. And I believe there's going to be an audio addon to Cubase - digital recording built into Cubase - so we'll be able to do vocals and everything side by side. That'll be really good for us."

Synths & samplers:

Roland JD800 (Tim: "I love messing around on the sliders...")
Ensoniq SQR (Jez: "Ensoniq gear is so unreliable. I really like it for bass noises, but I've had two ESQ1s and two SQRs now and they just kept on going down. I'm sorry, but I've got to say that...")
Akai S1100
Korg M1
Korg 01/W
Roland D110*
Roland U220 *
Roland S220 *
Digitech Vocalist
E-mu Vintage Keys *
Roland JX1 (x2) *

Rhythm:

Boss DR550
Yamaha RM50 *

Sequencing & editing:

Atari ST
Steinberg Cubase
Steinberg Synthworks M1 editor
Steinberg Avalon sample editor
Digidesign SoundTools
Alesis Datadisk SQ *
Miditemp PMM88 MIDI patchbay/processor *

Mixing:

Soundcraft 6000 24:16:2 console, at Lion Studios in Leeds.

* Guy Hatton, Lion Studios


On record

title format label released reached
What Can You Do For Me single ffrr/London August'91 10
Something Good single ffrr/London May '92 4
Believe In Me single ffrr/London April '93 8
Utah Saints album ffrr/London May '93 10 (still in Top 30)
I Want You single ffrr/London July 5th '93



Previous Article in this issue

Competition

Next article in this issue

Opening Windows


Music Technology - Copyright: Music Maker Publications (UK), Future Publishing.

 

Music Technology - Aug 1993

Artist:

Utah Saints


Role:

Band/Group

Interview by Phil Ward

Previous article in this issue:

> Competition

Next article in this issue:

> Opening Windows


Help Support The Things You Love

mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.

If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!

Donations for October 2021
Issues donated this month: 8

New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.

Funds donated this month: £30.00

All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.

If you're enjoying the site, please consider supporting me to help build this archive...

...with a one time Donation, or a recurring Donation of just £2 a month. It really helps - thank you!
muzines_logo_02

Small Print

Terms of usePrivacy