Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View
Hot Wiring Your Guitar | |
Article from Electronics & Music Maker, April 1981 | |


To avoid one control shutting off the signal from the other, the input (left-hand tag viewed from the back with the tags facing you) and wiper (centre tag) connections should be reversed for each pot. The circuit now appears as in Figure 2, with the tone and pickup part of the circuit remaining the same. Now at maximum volume setting the pickup is still connected directly to the selector switch (with the full track resistance to earth), but at the minimum setting the pickup is earthed and the track resistance lies between the earth and the selector switch, so the other signal is not shorted to ground. It is impossible to damage either pickup by shorting its ends together, and this occurs anyway with an unmodified two-pickup circuit when one volume is at 10 and the other at 0.

If the modification is done on just one volume pot. the other can be used as a 'master', shutting the signal off when at zero, with the ability to bring in the other pickup signal independently.
At this point, I will just explain about two different types of pot. available, for those beginners who don't know already. These are logarithmic ('audio') and linear, which are manufactured to give differently tapered responses. A linear pot. gives a constant change in signal amplitude (when used as a volume control) as the control is turned. But the ear hears this as a nonlinear change in volume. Audio pots. have a response that gives subjectively linear control of volume, and consequently are more useful as volume controls. Fitting a linear pot. instead of an audio pot. will give a large increase in volume over the first third with little else happening for the rest of the travel. Note that the two ends of an audio pot's track are not equivalent and reversing the track connections will give an even more extreme response, in addition to changing the direction of control.
Another modification I want to deal with is probably the simplest, cheapest, and in my opinion, the most effective of any. Leo Fender used it on the Telecaster and it is a major reason why that guitar sounds the way it does. It was also used by Travis Bean on humbuckers on the Standard and Artist models.

Quite simply, it is a 1nF capacitor across the 'in' and 'out' tags of the volume pot. As the volume is decreased slightly, treble frequencies bypass the resistance and proportionately increase the amount of treble in the sound. The increase is particularly noticeable with single coil pick-ups or tapped humbuckers, less obvious as an increase with straight humbuckers. Most guitars on the market now use audio pots, and the effect of the capacitor is most noticeable on these. A linear pot gives a barely noticeable effect as there is in my experience, less treble loss in the first place. Cheaper audio pots will give an immediate effect at a volume setting around nine, as the treble loss tends to occur very suddenly just under full volume. While linear pots give less treble loss, they can be less effective than audio immediately in front of a pre-amp. I've found that in that situation, I got virtually no change in level until I got down to around two, when the sound packed up altogether. Fitting audio pots cured the problem. So, although the 1nF capacitor bypass evolved primarily as a crude means of combating treble loss, these days it is very useful as a definite effect. Simple fitting should be as in Figure 3 but it is possible that you will find this a help in some circumstances, and a hindrance in others. For example, the softening effect of winding down an audio pot on a front pick-up can help in getting a warmer, jazzier sound without actually cutting treble on the usual passive tone pot, which can sometimes be difficult to set accurately, quickly. In this case, the answer is to make the capacitor switchable. An interesting side effect of using the capacitor is that passive tone controls will sound more effective, as, at lower volume settings, there is more treble left for them to cut than on an unmodified guitar, where the top end has already been rolled off by the volume pot.
Sample & Hold Modification - Provides Note Bender |
4780 Sequencer Modification |
Eliminating Patch Cords Without Eliminating Capability - A Practical Approach |
Magic Buttons - Touch Switch Theory |
Electronic Drum Sequencer - Software for BBC Micro |
PA Signal Processor (Part 1) |
Chip Parade (Part 1) |
Soldering On (Part 1) |
Destiny Modular Mixer - Input Module (Part 1) |
DIY Direct Inject Box - A high quality DI box circuit |
Lab Notes: Computer Music Without the Computer - or: What to do 'til your processor arrives. |
The Electric Drummer (Part 1) |
Browse by Topic:
Feature by Adrian Legg
Previous article in this issue:
Next article in this issue:
mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.
If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!
New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.
All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.
Do you have any of these magazine issues?
If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!