Magazine Archive

Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View

A Cynic Writes...

Name Your Poison

With the death of rock and roll, comes the death of decent band names, which have descended into labyrinthine coils of self-reference, bluff, navel-gazing and double-bluff. 'Carter The Unstoppable Sex Machine' - do they mean it? 'Therapy?' - possibly the most pretentious name ever. 'Ned's Atomic Dustbin' - not funny; 'Pop Will Eat Itself' - thank you, NME: accurate, but so ugly. And we won't mention the host of indecipherable initials, serial numbers and zip-codes in the wake of hip-hop, techno and house.

Abject silliness came to the fore at around the same time that people stopped caring, but still provided some entertaining monikers which actually announced that there was no meaning in these labels anymore: 'Blancmange' - like a defiant pie in the face; 'It's Immaterial' - superbly simple, the ultimate negation; and, of course, the blank, literal definitive, only possible post-punk: 'The The', and 'The Pop Group'. It's a tradition that continues apace on the indie scene, a blanket free-for-all with all the symptoms of rampant avant-gardism, a cultural cul-de-sac with no signposts. Only 'MC 900ft Jesus' has rekindled something of the true sense of the absurd, all but invisible against an absurd backdrop.

Names from the psychedelic era retain a naive, surreal charm - 'Pink Floyd'; 'Tangerine Dream'; 'Iron Butterfly' - relying either on the juxtaposition of opposing images, or just plain colour schemes that wouldn't look out of place now in a Dulux catalogue. But the real Golden Age was the new wave, with a host of genuinely sleazy, media-literate or just plain short and shocking handles: 'The Clash'; 'Television'; 'Magazine'; The Buzzcocks'; The Vibrators'; and my personal favourite - 'Any Trouble'. There was a glimmer of hope on the horizon when cool brevity returned via 'Curve', 'Lush', and 'Bleach'; but then what happens? 'New Fast Automatic Daffodils', that's what. They Might Be Giants, but they must be joking.

Previous Article in this issue


Next article in this issue

Incoming Data

Music Technology - Copyright: Music Maker Publications (UK), Future Publishing.


Music Technology - Jan 1993

Opinion by Brian Aspirin

Previous article in this issue:

> Communique

Next article in this issue:

> Incoming Data

Help Support The Things You Love

mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.

If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!

Donations for September 2020
Issues donated this month: 0

New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.

Funds donated this month: £38.00

All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.

If you're enjoying the site, please consider supporting me to help build this archive...

...with a one time Donation, or a recurring Donation of just £2 a month. It really helps - thank you!

Small Print

Terms of usePrivacy