Magazine Archive

Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View

Mikes (Part 1)

Article from One Two Testing, December 1983

Who are they?

What they do and why. Chris Dale ponders the sound, shape and purpose of modern microphones

The phenomenon of the microphone has always been a source of wonderment to me. My first conscious encounter with this instrument gave me to believe that I'd discovered a magic of fundamental importance. Herein lay a clue to the mysteries of the ancients; you speak in one end and it comes out the other, considerably louder. When I subsequently found out that the hollow tube along which the sound travelled was actually solid, my destiny was sealed.

Finding out about these basic principles of electro-acoustic transduction turned out to take somewhat less than a lifetime, but even so a little of that initial feeling of awe stays with me. Interesting chaps microphones.

But why are there so many different types on the market? What of cost, shape and size, why are capacitor mics better than dynamics and why do some people insist on spending hundreds of pounds on old, fifth hand valve mics when they can get a new FET version for half the price?

While different mics undoubtedly do display individual characteristics, just as with any other large commercial market, we are to an extent dealing with fashion. It's a fashion created by the industry expressly to sell product, and what more fashion conscious industry is there than Rock-and-Roll?

In the next three issues I hope to answer some of these questions and cover the main points of the most commonly used microphone types, plus a squint at the enduring appeal of the valve and the stigma attached to using the "right" mics. First things first, though, so I shall start right here and now with a look at what is the basic job of a microphone.

What we perceive as sound is actually rapid fluctuations in air pressure commonly referred to as sound waves. It is the job of the microphone to convert these acoustic changes into some kind of electrical equivalent. This is achieved by placing within the field of the pressure fluctuations an elastically suspended diaphragm which is moved to and fro according to the nature of the changes.

The next step is to cause the movements of the diaphragm to create the equivalent electrical voltage of which I spoke earlier. There are several ways in which this can be done, but as far as rock PA and recording are concerned, two methods stand way above the others in terms of popularity:

1) The moving coil dynamic
2) The condenser

The diaphragm of the dynamic has attached to it a lightweight coil of wire which is suspended between the poles of a permanent magnet. A long time before you were born, nature made up some laws which have been baffling us human types ever since. One such law states that when you move a piece of wire within a magnetic field an electrical voltage is induced in the wire. As we still don't really know what electricity is, we must accept, for the purposes of this explanation, that the law works.

As the diaphragm plus its coil is moved to and fro by the sound waves, a voltage is induced in the coil. The nature of the voltage relates directly to the sound waves causing it in terms of amplitude, phase and frequency.

The simplest form of dynamic exhibits an "omni-directional" polar response pattern, that is to say it is equally sensitive to sound coming from all directions. For general studio and PA work this type of mic tends to get left in the cupboard. The reason is that for most applications a high degree of "separation" is required between instruments, meaning that you don't want the piano mic picking up the drums etc. A microphone which has no directional discrimination will pick up anything, irrespective of where it's come from — I've got a mate who's a bit like that... no names, no pack drill, no hospital bills.

By providing a carefully designed acoustic path to the rear of the diaphragm, various kinds of "unidirectional" or "cardioid" type responses can be achieved. The latter name is derived from the fact that a graph of such a polar pattern resembles the classic shape of a heart.

Such mics have an area of maximum sensitivity directly in front of them and minimal pick up directly behind. Although they're not all that narrow in their selectivity their rugged construction, ease of use, relatively low cost and, in the best cases, very acceptably high performance make them by far the most commonly used stage microphone.

Next month I'll make mince meat out of nature's electrostatic principles and compare the performance of the condenser with that of the trusty dynamic. Terms such as transients, frequency response, sensitivity, balancing, impedance and proximity effect will be bandied about. I really wouldn't miss it if I were you.

Series - "Mikes"

Read the next part in this series:

Mikes (Part 2)
(12T Jan 84)

All parts in this series:

Part 1 (Viewing) | Part 2 | Part 3

More from these topics

Browse by Topic:


Sound Fundamentals

Previous Article in this issue

Moog Rogue

Next article in this issue

Westone Session II

Publisher: One Two Testing - IPC Magazines Ltd, Northern & Shell Ltd.

The current copyright owner/s of this content may differ from the originally published copyright notice.
More details on copyright ownership...


One Two Testing - Dec 1983

Donated by: Colin Potter



Sound Fundamentals



Part 1 (Viewing) | Part 2 | Part 3

Feature by Chris Dale

Previous article in this issue:

> Moog Rogue

Next article in this issue:

> Westone Session II

Help Support The Things You Love

mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.

If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!

Donations for July 2024
Issues donated this month: 14

New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.

Funds donated this month: £20.00

All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.

Magazines Needed - Can You Help?

Do you have any of these magazine issues?

> See all issues we need

If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!

If you're enjoying the site, please consider supporting me to help build this archive...

...with a one time Donation, or a recurring Donation of just £2 a month. It really helps - thank you!

Small Print

Terms of usePrivacy