Results: 1 - 17 of 17 displayed.
mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.
If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!
New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.
All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.
Do you have any of these magazine issues?
If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!
Fostex B16 Tape RecorderReview | Home & Studio Recording, Jan 1984 |
Fostex E16 MultitrackReview | Music Technology, Nov 198616-track Tape RecorderEver since its launch, the Fostex B16 has dominated the budget 16-track studio market Now Paul White tests its successor, the E16, and finds out if the improvements are worthwhile. |
Fostex E16 Multitrack RecorderReview | Sound On Sound, May 1988Many people own one and even more would like to, for the E16 is the 16-track tape machine to aspire to. Gareth Stuart finds out why. |
Fostex G16Review | Sound On Sound, Sep 1990David Mellor looks at a 16-track machine which brings a new level of sophistication to the world of 'personal' multitrack. |
Fostex G24SReview | Sound On Sound, Mar 1991SSSH... From You Know WhoFollowing last month's review of the Tascam MSR24S, Dave Lockwood turns his attention to Fostex's new one-inch 24-track with Dolby S: The G24S. |
Head To HeadReview | Recording Musician, Aug 1992Fostex R8 & Tascam TSR8 RecordersPaul White checks out Tascam's TSR8 and Fostex's R8 open reel, 8-track machines side by side. |
Revox C278Review | Recording Musician, Sep 19928-Track Tape RecorderSince its dramatic drop in price, the C278 is an attractive proposition to the private user who puts quality before frills. |
Revox C278Review | Sound On Sound, Aug 1989For A Few Dollars More...What price a reputation? The Revox brand name is well established and very well respected, but the new model C278 8-track costs a lot more than the Fostex and Tascam equivalents. David Mellor asks whether it is worth the extra. |
Sweet Little SixteenReview | Sound On Sound, Aug 1991Tascam MSR16S MultitrackHaving made its debut on the new generation of affordable 1" 24-tracks, Dolby S has now given a new lease of life to Tascam's MSR16S. Dave Lockwood explains why. |
Tascam MSR16Review | Sound On Sound, Dec 1988The AlternativeSo far, affordable 16-track has been a one horse race and all the money has been on Fostex. But now the odds are getting more interesting as a lively young thoroughbred from the Tascam stable enters the starting stalls. David Mellor assesses the form. |
Tascam MSR24SReview | Sound On Sound, Feb 1991'S' AppealIs it the birth of a new standard? Dave Lockwood drools over Tascam's Dolby S-equipped one-inch 24-track. |
Tascam TSR8 vs Fostex E8Review | Sound On Sound, Jul 1989The 8-Track ChallengeThe 8-track challenge: with the release of a new Tascam machine and the recent price cut on the Fostex E8, we thought it opportune to compare the two models. David Mellor adjudicates in the battle of the budget 8-tracks. |
Teac X1000M Tape RecorderReview | Home & Studio Recording, Sep 1983 |
The Big OneReview | Sound On Sound, Jan 1990Tascam MSR24 24-track 1" Tape RecorderEver since the dark ages, prophets and soothsayers have been forecasting the Big One. Well here it is - Tascam's 24-track on one inch tape recorder. David Mellor investigates. |
The Tascam Way - Part 1Review Series | Sound International, May 1978The Teac 80-8 tape machine, Tascam Model 5 mixer, and dbx DX-8 noise-reduction unit. |
Page 1 of 1