Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View
Article Group: | |
Pacific | |
PacificArticle from Phaze 1, April 1989 |
"SAMPLED CELLOS OR TRUMPETS SOUND OK, SOMETIMES THEY EVEN SOUND PRETTY GOOD. BUT ADD A FEW TRACKS OF THE REAL STUFF AND THEY ALL SOUND AMAZING."
"In the studio, no problem", Dennis insists. "Sampled cellos or trumpets sound OK, sometimes they even sound pretty good. But add a few tracks of the real stuff and they all sound amazing. And it's what you need to stop the hi-tech stuff sounding cold."
And live?
"It's not so easy. You can't mike all of them up very effectively, so we got a job-lot of Syrinx transducers - flexible ribbons, stuck on the instruments with double-sided tape. We use a mike on the trumpet and me and Vanessa's vocals, but that's all."
How about backing? Pacific don't have a traditional rhythm section, so what do they use instead?
"We started off using an early version of Steinberg's Pro24 sequencer, and loading the backing track in from disk at the end of each song. It's a bit nerve-wracking. You could alter the running order, and I suppose you could even alter the tempo if you wanted to react to the audience vibe, but it's really limited by the amount of expanders and samplers you can take on the road. With a Roland MT32 and a Casio FZ1 you're limited - especially by the FZ1's sample loading time and monophonic outputs.
"Then we tried a digital backing tape on video format. At least that way you can put exactly as much as you want on it, by mixing stuff in the studio. But you've got no accurate cueing system — the beginnings of songs just happen so that's not ideal either. The best compromise we've come up with at the moment is to transfer that backing tape onto DAT. The big advantages with that are that it will search and find a different track if you want to change the running order, and the ID code is so accurate it gives you really effective cueing. That way you're not taken by surprise when the music starts! It names tracks as well, so there's no chance of getting the wrong track by mistake."
What's next?
More samplers, more expanders, more real instruments, and forget all that lot if we don't produce good songs."
I'll second that.
ChitChat
Interview by Peter Forrest
mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.
If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!
New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.
All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.
Do you have any of these magazine issues?
If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!