Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View
Mitchell Froom and Suzanne Vega | |
Recording 99.9F° | Suzanne Vega, Mitchell FroomArticle from Recording Musician, March 1993 |
A new slant on production for Suzanne's latest album, 99.9F°.
For her most recent album, Suzanne Vega wanted a producer prepared to radically change her sound and provide a new direction; Mitchell Froom was the man she chose. Paul Tingen talked to them both about the recording of the innovative 99.9F°.
Enter the Los Angeles band Los Lobos, who were, after a few lacklustre albums, also "prepared to stick their necks out." After a period of wild experimentation, Froom and Los Lobos came up with Kiko, an album listed, like Vega's 99.9F°, by O magazine as one of 1992's top 50 records. The magazine stated that Kiko was 'a record which has conjured up superlatives virtually unheard since The Band's Last Waltz', whilst noting the radical departure from the previous work of both Los Lobos and Vega. With both, Froom went for a no-holds-barred approach to production, turning the whole thing into a revolutionary experience for himself, band and artist. Making records would never be the same again. "Working with Los Lobos felt like a reinvention of what I'd done until then," enthuses Froom, "It was a breakthrough record for me, artistically. The roof blew off! I've been working with the same engineer for six or seven years now, Tchad Blake, and for both of us it was the first time that we felt that we'd finally come to some really new and individual techniques and approaches." He immediately adds, almost in the same breath, that their aim was not to be new or experimental as a gimmick, but rather to "get to the bottom of the songs and of what an artist is about and try to find a way to express that which is distinctive and not settle for something which is maybe easier or more commercially agreeable." Froom's objective as a producer had changed from purely trying to be of service to artists, to challenging them to come up with innovative and adventurous ideas. "It's not a matter of trying to do weird things per se, because that can counter the power of the song. I'm talking about arrangement and about somehow finding the source of a song. It's not window dressing or trying to be clever or smug."
In the case of Los Lobos' Kiko he succeeded magnificently. The record sounds radically different from its predecessors, in fact from every other record produced today, whilst sounding more authentic and closer to the band's Mexican and R&B roots than ever before. The freshness, aliveness and directness of the record is stunning. It sounds ike a band playing live in the studio or a small room, which, says Froom, "was how we often recorded them." Instruments are panned hard left and right, creating a very distinct spatial dimension, and the guitars especially have a vibrant rough edge to them, giving one the impression of having one's ears right in front of the speaker.
Surprisingly, perhaps, given the unusual and non-glossy sound of Kiko, Los Lobos's American record company, Slash, loved the record. Froom's producing career, rather than having gone out with a bang, appeared to have gone up with a bang. It was while he was still in the euphoric mood following his reinvention of the production wheel that Vega approached him to see whether he was interested in producing her next album. She'd sent demo tapes of her new material to three different producers she was interested in. "One of the producers said that I should do something entirely different and maybe do a rap record or something," Vega remembers, laughing, "another one thought that the tape was great as it was, and Mitchell told me that he liked the songs, but but didn't like the production. He thought he could do better. This was what I wanted to hear, because was curious to work with somebody who could teach me some things. Mitchell felt that the music should have a lot more vitality and should sound more unusual. He told me that my approach was too ordinary and that it was a mistake to use a normal rock 'n' roll drum kit."
Keeping in mind that Vega's demos were high-quality, digital recordings, produced very much in the same vein as her first three albums (the track 'Blood Sings' on 99.9F° remains from those sessions - Froom simply overdubbed some keyboards), Froom's criticisms and suggestions are a stirring lesson in production technique. They're more than worth taking note of for any artist or band struggling to get the best out of their material. Vega has no problems remembering Froom's clear-cut and hard-hitting feedback. "He told me that I had a small voice and he wanted to take it out of all the competition it was having on my previous albums, especially the drums. He also felt that my previous albums had sounded too pristine and too clean. He felt that my music should sound small, dry and intimate yet at the same time have more edge to it. One way of doing that would be to bring a lot more distortion into the music. What he said made good sense to me."
Froom explains that his comments were very much the result of trying to feel into the essence of Vega's songs and wanting to bring out their power and depth: "I felt that we could go for pretty unusual arrangements; not to be weird, but because her music is a strange hybrid of things as it is. It's not pure folk music, yet it is acoustic guitar-based and Suzanne does have a very soft, pretty voice. But what she's singing about are very intense things. So it made sense to make the music more powerful to reflect the emotions of her words, rather than the tone of her voice. That was the heart of what I was trying to get to. I was therefore determined to make her voice sound as conversational as possible, right in your ear, which gives a much more unsettling feeling, rather than having these big, washy, beautiful reverbs."
This 'conversational, right in your ear' approach also reflected the origins of Vega's singing and song writing. As a child Vega used to, she says, "sing songs for my brothers and sisters to keep them from fighting one another and to amuse them. That's an intimate quality that often comes out in my writing. On the other hand, observations about power and who has it and who doesn't, are at the core of most of my songs — like, for example, in 'Rock In This Pocket', which is about David and Goliath and describes the moment when David is about to throw the rock. So there's a strange tension in my work." It was Froom's aim to bring out these tensions, to expose all juxtapositions in Vega's work, between small and large, intimate and dramatic, coolness and warmth, humor and melancholy, acoustic and electric. Vega: "He respects people's eccentricities. What interests him is what's unusual in a person. He's not interested in making someone sound like someone else but rather in emphasising the things that are strange." Yet Froom admits that further than the general ideas outlined above, he initially "didn't know specifically" how it all would sound in practice.
Vega explains why having her acoustic guitar and vocals upfront meant a lot to her: "I didn't want people to feel that this was some kind of trick. I wanted people to be able to hear that the music was actually standing on something solid, that it was acoustic based, but not in way they'd heard before." Froom adds: "The challenge was how to reconcile the acoustic guitar with tough, unusual arrangments, particularly if it's played in a fingerpicking style, which can soften the music too much. So you have to be able to counter that with some very strong and definite elements. That's why it worked out that the bass could drive the music so well, because it was the furthest away from the range of her acoustic guitar. It provided a counterpoint. That's also why the electric guitar playing is much spottier, because it's in the same frequency range as the vocals and acoustic guitar and too much of it would have drowned them out."
The bass playing on 99.9F°, courtesy of Bruce Thomas and Jerry Scheff, is stunning and is mixed right upfront. Tracks like 'As Girls Go' and 'Fat Man & Dancing Girl' swing irresistably, propelled by the fat, full-frontal bass and the innovative percussion and drum playing of, rather unexpectedly, Jerry Marotta. The man of the big, majestic, anthem-like drum sound with Peter Gabriel seems hardly a likely choice in a context where a producer wants small and intimate sounds and wants to do away with traditional rock drumming altogether. Yet Froom had his reasons: "I'd worked with Jerry before, like on Tom Finn's solo album, and I'd seen in him the ability to make music out of anything. I didn't want to use a regular percussionist, for fear that he might be leaning too much in a Latin direction and that would be whole different direction again. I wanted the tension that Jerry could provide, yet to make him play very close and very intimate and very unusual and develop something that would be highly musical. He was the only guy that I could think of who could do that. And he really liked it, because it was a chance for him to reinvent himself. He usually gets called up because people want him for the big sound he produced with Gabriel."
Unusual indeed. Froom confronted Marotta with all manner of crazy situations - like balancing a tambourine on his foot whilst playing something else - and getting him to play all sorts of things which would not normally be used for percussion. At the end of it Tchad Blake would warp and distort things, creating a percussive backing which was continuously fluid, moving, natural, yet unrecognisable. On the title song of the album, for example, Marotta was playing some tiny hand drums of which Blake created a loop and took all the bottom and mid out, after which Marotta overdubbed the same hand drums again, creating the effect of a loop with the original, EQ-ed hand drum "making a great crackling kind of sound." Vega remembers the whole percussion episode with great affection: Laughing: "All the percussion tracks are a combination of Mitchell and Jerry going crazy. Sometimes there were sampled and sequenced elements, but most of it was played live. Every day we'd put together a different drum and percussion kit for each song. Jerry was playing a very peculiar assortment of things in bizarre positions. It was really funny. Some of the things were very simple, like him slapping his leg with his hand and Tchad picking that up and distorting it. The silliest day was when they ended up putting a plastic bag over the mike and trying to hit that with one of the sticks and seeing how it would sound. It sounded terrible. Another weird moment was when the whole band were playing snare drums. That sounded terrible too, so we erased it."
"Suzanne Vega: He felt that my music should sound small, dry and intimate yet at the same time have more edge to it. One way of doing that would be to bring a lot more distortion into the music. What he said made good sense to me."
Erasing things that didn't work instantly was, it turns out, one of the other unsual ways in which Froom and Blake worked. Most songs were recorded live in the studio by the whole band, to get a general picture, after which elements were added and/or replaced. Vega: "But they don't hang on to anything. When it came to the mix they'd already erased everything they weren't using. Being as quick and focussed as Tchad and Mitchell were was a new way of working for me." Froom: "If you just keep things you don't know anything. Production to me is a matter of of commitment to do things in a certain way and be bold about it. You have to be willing to say instantly with every overdub: 'that's it', or 'that isn't it', and go down a certain path. You can always change it again. But filling up all your tracks and making up your mind later is nonsense. 99.9F° was recorded on 24-track analogue Dolby SR, but we could have done it on 16 tracks."
He adds that the same awareness of layering musical instruments according to their frequency ranges was also applied to the EQ-ing in the mix. Froom: "This is really Tchad's area and it's where he's become great, especially recently. The trick is to layer frequencies correctly; for example you decide where the high end is coming from, maybe from the vocals and hi-hat and then you don't put high end on other instruments. You layer the whole thing in such a way that everything has its own place. If the arrangement is simple enough and the mix powerful enough, you'll find that it will sound good anywhere, on any sound system.
"What's often done today is that you get extreme amounts of high end because it cuts through and gives you that kind of sugary sound. To this people add tons of reverb, and that can work if you're happy with that, but to me there's little emotion in there. I think it's fake energy. It makes your music sound like every other record that you've ever heard."
"Mitchell Froom: It made me really happy that the Nirvana record sold more than Michael Jackson; all of a sudden people don't know what it takes to be successful any more. That opens up possibilities for music to come out of nowhere, and that gives me hope."
With this he touches on one of the things he cares about most, and one of the great achievements of Kiko and 99.9F°: both records have a completely original and instantly indentifiable sound. In a time when almost all records have the same, washy, glossy sound, and when even musical innovators of repute (Rupert Hine, Thomas Dolby, etc) state publicly that it's now practically impossible to be innovative with sound — because of the omnipresence of samples and synth patches — and that they therefore concentrate purely on 'writing good songs', Froom and Blake's achievement is especially inspiring.
Lastly, Froom is reluctant to be drawn into any detailed discussions of how he and Blake achieved this from a technical point of view, considering this Tchad Blake's area, and adding "I'd rather concentrate on the 98% than the 2% percent. The difference in emotional effect between a track recorded digitally or analogue, on an SSL or a Neve, or with this or that mic is nil. What I'm not a fan of is hearing the same thing over and over again. So many people use the same samples and reverbs and their records all sound the same and it's destroying music. But I think things are turning around a bit at the moment. The atmosphere isn't quite as conservative as it was a year ago. It made me really happy that the Nirvana record sold more than Michael Jackson, so all of a sudden people don't know what it takes to be successful any more. That opens up possibilities for music to come out of nowhere and that gives me hope." And he concludes, with a nod to young musicians: "I hear so many demos where it is so obvious what people have been listening to and what they think they need to impress you. People get really excited today when a band comes along that sounds like the early Stones. But when The Stones came out people weren't excited about them because they sounded like Elmore James or something. The Stones, The Beatles, The Animals all made their own original noise, they figured out their own way of making a sound. What I'm really looking for is to hear people make their own original noise again, that they find a way of expressing themselves that's not tainted by expectations."
Interview
by Paul Tingen
Website: www.tingen.org
mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.
If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!
New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.
All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.
Do you have any of these magazine issues?
If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!