Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View
Alphabet Soup | |
Roland Alpha Juno 1Article from Electronics & Music Maker, January 1986 |
Roland’s latest analogue poly offers no earth-shattering innovations, but is still a welcome addition to the synth market’s ever-expanding lower end. Or so says Simon Trask, anyway.
Roland have repackaged their cheapest analogue polysynth, the Juno 106, and called it the Alpha Juno 1. But will a cosmetic clean-up and the addition of a few clever facilities be enough to stem the digital tide?
Over the past decade or two, the Japanese have consistently astounded the world with their ability to produce consumer goods at astonishingly low prices and in astonishingly large quantities. In the world of hi-tech musical instruments, the Nips now rule the roost at every price level save the highest, where American and Australian innovation (plus the fact that costs are virtually irrelevant) keeps the New World ahead.
At more realistic levels, Japanese industry giants like Yamaha and Casio have revolutionised the way people think about digital music technology in little more than a couple of years. Their instruments are the subject of huge, time-consuming investment programmes, but the results are worth it. And the two companies, locked for some years in a battle for supremacy of the domestic portable keyboard market, are now at loggerheads at the professional end of the scale, too; witness Casio's excursions upmarket with the CZ5000 Phase Distortion poly (soon to be joined by a sequencer-less stablemate, the CZ3000), and Yamaha's pre-Christmas launch of the mini-keyboard DX100, the cheapest FM synth yet.
But where does this leave Roland, one-time undisputed leaders of the polysynth market? The Junos 6 and 60, though still valued, are of a past generation. Similarly, the JX3P and Juno 106 are no longer in production — though you'll still find a few 106s in the shops if you're quick. Meanwhile, the year-old JX8P has been left propping up the £1000 sector of the synth market with not a lot beneath it.
Now Roland have come up with the six-voice, four-octave Alpha Juno 1 as their entry in the race to find the ultimate budget polysynth. As with the new DXs, the Alpha provides nothing new in the sound department — it merely repackages already existing technology in a cheaper (to build as well as to buy) and more 'modern' format. Its role in life is simple: to win back for Roland the prestige, and the final success, the first crop of Junos gave them three or four years ago.
For some obscure reason which must ultimately be something to do with design considerations, only Roland's earlier flagship poly — the Jupiter 8 — has featured eight voices. All their other synths, even the JX8P, have been six-voice. When you consider that the CZs and Yamaha's new budget DXs are eight-voice, that's a disappointment.
The first consequence of the 'modern' approach is that the Alpha employs membrane switches on its front panel, and follows the pattern of centralised digital access. This contrasts with its predecessor, the Juno 106, which had lots of nice individual-function sliders on its front panel. Still, a 16-character LCD is provided, and — wonder of wonders — it's backlit so you can see it in dark environments like between-song stages and dingy rehearsal rooms. Maybe Roland will start a trend.
The so-called 'Alpha dial' is by no means a new feature. The Moog Source, the first digital access synth of all (so that's where the finger of blame should be pointed), had something similar, and more recently, Oberheim's Matrix 12 polysynth has featured infinite rotary knobs for parameter-switching.
I have mixed feelings about Roland's dial. You use it, instead of front panel buttons, to select parameters, which means you have to keep swapping between parameter and value functions for the dial; and you have to be able to remember in what order the parameters come as they whirl past you on the LCD. A single-step option (you know, good ol' increment and decrement buttons) would have been handy to have had alongside the dial, because although having an infinite rotary control allows the relationship between physical distance of dial movement and parameter/value adjustment to be set (by Roland) to what is most convenient, it's still all too easy to sweep blindly past the parameter or value you want. When it comes to changing values, you are at least presented with a display that shows you both the unaltered value and any new value that you set.
Overall it's not a bad system, but it's no miracle cure for the ills of digital access, either.
"Facilities - Can a Roland be a Roland without a chorus unit? Obviously not; the Alpha's has programmable rate over a range of 0-127."
Much neater is the way Roland have provided a shortcut to editing sound patches. Instead of modifying all the voice parameters, you can edit selected groups of parameters from one front-panel control. The group parameters are modulation rate, modulation depth, brilliance and envelope time.
Pitchbend and modulation are implemented on a single controller similar to that found on the JX8P, with pitchbend controlled by left-to-right movement and modulation by forward movement of the controller; the two can also be mixed.
The Alpha's four-octave keyboard range can be expanded via MIDI reception to eight octaves, or to put it another way, the synth's sound software and circuitry is capable of responding to pitches over an expanded range. Another plus (and a big one at that) for the Alpha is that it's capable of responding to both attack velocity and channel aftertouch over MIDI. All of which helps make the Alpha a good bet as a MIDI slave instrument, in spite of its physical limitations.
"Operation - Critics will pan the Chord Memory feature for being unprofessional, but why not accept it the same way you would a drum machine or a sequencer?"
Finally, can a Roland synth be a Roland synth without built-in chorus? Obviously not. The Alpha's is a voice-programmable feature, with a chorus rate adjustable over a scale of 0-127. That's a big improvement on the 106's selection of just two rates, if a little OTT; are you ever actually going to use 128 different chorus rate settings? Somehow, I doubt it.
What of the sounds you get on the Alpha? Well, both 64-patch groups offer a healthy selection of voices; you're unlikely to be sorry you're stuck with the preset, ROM-based sounds. The sound 'families' are organised according to the banks, so that bank 1, in both preset and memory groups, consists of brass sounds, bank 2 of strings, bank 3 of piano and guitar imitations, and so on.
The pianos don't have either the presence or the warmth of well-programmed FM, but there's a nice selection of organ voices, including some stunning pipe organ presets that have much of the fullness and acoustic detail of the real thing being played in a cathedral.
Predictably, the Alpha also comes up with the goods on its string patches. 'Junostrings' are the best of the bunch because, unlike many string synth patches, they're equally at home in both chordal and solo work.
The Alpha woodwind is thin — weedy rather than reedy, and unlikely to make much of an impression in amongst the contents of a ZTT-scale mix. The bass sounds (especially the synth bass ones, which is most of them) are a lot better, punchy and dynamic, and there's also an array of lead synth sounds; the new Juno doesn't have a synth section strong enough to make the solo voices viable Minimoog alternatives, but they're still OK.
Then there are the sound effects. 'Twilite Zone' is eerie enough for you to suddenly not want to be alone at night (even if it's eleven in the morning), and there's also a rather hackneyed line-up of jets, helicopters and explosions: somehow they just aren't as much fun now as they were when they had novelty on their side, and they're as musically useless as ever.
"Sounds - The Alpha has all the sonic strengths and weaknesses of previous Junos, though it does sound better than its predecessor, the 106."
As well as the obvious MIDI channel selection of 1-16 for transmission and reception over MIDI, the Alpha lets you override individual channel reception by setting Omni on. This means the synth transmits on the set channel but receives on all channels, which is a sort of halfway house to having separate transmit/receive channels. These parameters are storable during power-down (though you have to write them into the backup memory first), but are not programmable for each patch.
Of more potential significance is the fact that the Alpha is the first synth to make use of handshaking communication for patch data transmission/reception over MIDI. 'Handshaking' is the term used to describe what happens when two ends of a communications link (in this instance, two Alphas or an Alpha and a computer running patch-dump software) pass messages to and fro in order to tell one another when to transmit, and when data has been successfully received. Thus the Alpha can tell a receiving unit that it wants to send patch data, can respond to a request for such data, can send an acknowledgement of successful or unsuccessful reception, and can even send a rejection message for real-time discontinuation of transmission or reception. These features are all part of a new protocol agreed by the MMA (MIDI Manufacturers' Association) for transmission and reception of sample data, and so far implemented only on the Prophet 2000 sampler. But this form of communication will probably become a standard on synths as well, so full marks to Roland for putting it on such a low-cost instrument.
Aside from storage over MIDI, there's the inevitable cassette storage but, sadly, no cartridge option. So if no suitable software becomes available, it looks like it's Back To Tape for Alpha Juno owners wanting to store more than 64 of their own sounds. Ah, well.
So, we've discovered that the Alpha Juno 1 is a useful addition to the polysynth market's lower end. As a source of typical 'analogue' synth sounds, it goes down well next to the digital crispness of the cheap DXs and CZs. Only trouble is, there isn't a touch-sensitive keyboard between them. With the Alpha responsive to attack velocity and aftertouch over MIDI, it's obviously intended to shine as second fiddle to a touch-sensitive synth — as became apparent when I slaved it to an Oberheim Matrix 6 (see review elsewhere this issue).
The Alpha has all the traditional sonic strengths and weaknesses of Roland analogue polys — though subjectively, it does sound better than the machine it replaces, the Juno 106. The six-voice limitation is still a worry, and no matter from which viewpoint I view the synth's sonic capabilities, I find myself wishing the Alpha's designers had come up with a sound-generation system that was just a bit more inspiring than the one the company have been using for the last four years. The Alpha's factory sounds are of a high overall standard, but most of them have been heard before, and not just on machines in higher price brackets.
But Roland have introduced a number of worthwhile refinements such as the backlit LCD, assignable performance controllers, and a flexible MIDI implementation. There's enough on it, and in it, to make the Alpha attractive to the first-time buyer, yet it's really at its best as a second synth. It should do well.
Dial-A-Dream - Roland Alpha Juno-1
(SOS Mar 86)
Roland Alpha Juno 1
(12T Feb 86)
Roland Alpha Juno One - Synthcheck
(IM Feb 86)
Patchwork
(MT Apr 88)
...and more Patchwork articles... (Show these)
Program Notes
(MM Apr 86)
Browse category: Synthesizer > Roland
Roland Alpha Juno 2 Polysynth
(EMM Feb 86)
Roland Alpha Juno-2 - SynthCheck
(IM Mar 86)
Patchwork
(MT Dec 86)
...and 3 more Patchwork articles... (Show these)
Program Notes
(MM Oct 86)
Program Notes
(MM Nov 86)
Browse category: Synthesizer > Roland
Review by Simon Trask
mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.
If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!
New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.
All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.
Do you have any of these magazine issues?
If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!